Six Things I Believe about Israel and Gaza

Trying to find clarity amidst the madness

It has been nearly six months since a large-scale attack in Israel thrust the region into war. I wrote a lengthy, scattered post about it in the early days, reacting to the complexity of being a liberal Jewish person watching Israel descend into chaos and madness.

In the intervening months, some things have become clearer to me, and others remain a muddle. I would like to share my updated observations and perspective, understanding the limits of talking about a crisis in the middle of the crisis.

  1. Netanyahu has to go.

    Until he does, until a new Israeli government takes over, this crisis will never end. There are a number of ways in which he has proven himself to be inept, dishonest, and driven by the need to remain in power. Specifically, his fidelity to the most extreme right-wing voices in his coalition has resulted in starvation, forced evictions, over-the-top violence, and increased settlement activity. He is salting the Earth against a future Palestinian state, and increasingly his bad actions are turning the world against Israel. It is my judgment that his continued leadership poses a greater threat to Israel than Hamas and Hezbollah combined. If Israel loses American support, it will be due to his massive incompetence.

    In a perverse way, Netanyahu has given a gift to his eventual successor. It is highly unlikely his Likud party will remain in power once elections are held, and any new government will appear liberal by comparison. The simple and frankly obvious step of restoring unrestricted food deliveries to Gaza will be seen as benevolent statecraft instead of being the bare minimum the law and humanity requires.

  2. Hamas needs to be defeated from within, and not by Israel

    In the early weeks of the war, Israel’s military demonstrated for the umpteenth time their vast military superiority over Hamas. There is no question that in a fair fight, Israel wins every time. That is why Hamas doesn’t fight fair: they conducted a sneak attack, took hostages, and fled back to within a civilian population. When Israel came after them, they demanded a humanitarian ceasefire, saying that any attempt to come after them would be a war crime because of the presence of civilians. They created the problem, and I have no sympathy for their cries of victimhood.

    The Gazan civilians, however, are victims of both Israel and Hamas. They are caught between a military superpower and a ruthless, frightened faction of armed zealots. Calls from Israel for Gazans to turn against Hamas and overthrow them assume a level of control and volition that simply doesn’t exist; Gazans have no practical ability to challenge Hamas, and won’t have that capability until they are joined by other Arab and Muslim voices and forces.

    Hamas has been negotiating for a permanent ceasefire, and based on its negotiating position, it believes it is winning the war and can remain in power. Israel cannot and will not allow that to happen; no ceasefire will be permanent unless it results in removing Hamas from power.

    In my opinion, the solution will require regional allies to propose an alternative government that is run by Palestinians- not an outside force of any kind- and that has a clear mandate to rebuild, restore order, and negotiate for a permanent peace, not just a permanent ceasefire. Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar, and Egypt have a role to play here, and they have the financial ability and moral authority to be credible arbiters of an alternative government for Gaza.

  3. Iran’s proxies need to be challenged and defeated everywhere they operate

    Among the only things that Israel is doing right is its targeting of Iranian militia leaders in Syria and throughout the region. Iran is playing a dangerous, destabilizing game. They are trying to take advantage of this conflict to sew regional discord and elevate their own influence. The Houthi rebels, Hezbollah, and the other factions and acolytes of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard must be eliminated from all areas in which they are ensconced.

    Since Iran benefits from the conflict, it will have an incentive to undermine any peaceful solution. Since Israel is so trigger-happy in the wake of the October 7 attacks, it is not difficult for Iran and its proxies to derail any de-escalation by launching missiles, employing snipers, or carrying out terrorist attacks. They must be denounced, attacked, and removed from the areas they claim outside of Iran and throughout the region.

  4. The anti-Israel left still doesn’t have a clue

    My liberal friends continue to consistently disappoint me when they talk about Israel. Just today, I spent part of my morning fact-checking and disputing a meme about how (1) Israel claimed that rapes happened but it was all made up and (2) the IDF shot a pregnant woman after raping her in front of her entire family. Neither of these things was true, but by the time a lengthy thread of comments produced the receipts to dispute them, there were three other memes up, again parroting anti-Israel talking points.

    On a recent visit to see my sister in Virginia, we encountered an anti-Israel march, with chants of “5, 6, 7, 8, we don’t want no JEW state,” emphasis in the original. It is easy to see why protests are the conflict are being conflated with anti-Semitism.

    There is a real and valuable conversation to be had about Israel’s role as a ethno-nationalist state in a region prone to conflict. The reactionary left doesn’t engage with that conversation: they engage in sloganeering, hyperbole, and propaganda. Outrage politics are not constructive, and they have largely had the effect of making the Israelis dig in their heels, as they are seen as proof that the world truly doesn’t understand and doesn’t support Israel’s right to safety.

    If Israel accepted the demands of the left and unilaterally stopped its operations in Gaza, what would happen? Hamas would remain in power, and would plan their next attack; they have stated that October 7 was only the beginning. Since taking hostages proved so effective, we can expect to see more people assaulted and held captive. Withdrawing from Gaza without a plan is no solution, and I am yet to hear a credible leftist proposal for unwinding the conflict in a way calculated to lead to lasting peace.

  5. The UN is causing more harm than it helps

    When Israel accused UNRWA of having ties to Hamas generally, and the October 7 attacks specifically- an accusation UNRWA did not deny- it gave Israel a colorable excuse to cut off their access and funding. This was a distraction that nobody needed, since UNRWA is tasked with providing relief to the very people who are suffering most.

    At the same time, the UN took months before acknowledging sexual violence by Hamas, which they did with such general, milquetoast language that it seemed to be a begrudging acknowledgement in the face of overwhelming evidence, including first-hand accounts.

    The UN resolutions for a ceasefire are a political sideshow, a zero-stakes game that has no impact on the conflict, but gives superpowers the ability to claim they are taking action, when all they are really doing is taking meaningless votes.

    This conflict is beyond the UN’s ability to effect positive influence, and they should step aside and let other actors- ideally led by other states in the region- take the lead in the rebuilding effort.

  6. A viable Palestinian state is still crucial, and is going to require a lot of money

    Now that Gaza has been all but leveled by the IDF, it will require a massive amount of investment in order to rebuild. In my view, if they rebuild it as it was- an impoverished enclave- a major opportunity will be missed.

    Gaza should be rebuilt as an economic powerhouse, with modern construction, dynamic port facilities, and the infrastructure needed to become a regional beacon of development and prosperity. There would be poetic justice in creating an independent Gaza that is the envy of the region, including Israel. Economic prosperity- not subsistence levels of donated food- is the best way to combat extremism in the long-term. This will require a high level of support from the United States- both financially, and in restraining Israel from interfering- as well as other regional and world powers.

    The Israeli voices- a minority for sure, but a loud minority- arguing against an eventual Palestinian state are playing a dangerous game. There are three possibilities that do not involve a two-state solution: a united Israel that does not have a Jewish majority; an ethnically cleansed Israel where Palestinians have been largely killed or deported; or an apartheid state in which Jewish Israelis are the only ones with full citizenship. All of these are unacceptable to me, and I believe would be unacceptable to most.

    Palestinians must be empowered to declare statehood on a viable territory encompassing Gaza and the great majority of the West Bank. In previous times, arguments about the precise borders, whether Palestine can militarize, and other ancillary issues have doomed negotiations to failure. I believe the first step- declaring a state in the areas where there is broad consensus that state should be situated- should not wait on a final, comprehensive agreement to all terms. Independence can build momentum, and the Palestinian people have waited generations for statehood; they should not be made to wait another generation to raise their flag.

~AG

Published in: on April 1, 2024 at 1:39 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , ,

The Catastrophe

Trying to find the words to talk about unspeakable violence.

I don’t often spend much time staring at a blank word processing document. Avoiding writer’s block is easy: simply don’t start until you already have something you want to say. I call it the Mr. Ed approach to writing. 

For several days, however, I have had a strong sense that there is something I need to write, a perspective I need to share. Some feelings, prompted by the attack on Israel, that need to be blunted through expression, vented into the ether. 

I dreaded each time I logged onto social media last week. My politics lean heavily left and, with each passing year, are moving further leftward, but this is one issue the left can never seem to get right. After making a rough identification of Israel as oppressors and Palestinians as oppressed, liberals tend to center Palestinian victimhood, rationalizing the killing of Israelis as the revolutionary howls of an oppressed people. 

In this way, the leftists become reactionaries. 

The term “reactionary left” is typically- and inaccurately- used by right wingers. Here, though, I use it to describe people who otherwise have nuanced, well-informed, compassionate views on political issues, but who are grafting a good-versus-evil mentality onto this conflict, where it very definitely does not belong. 

My desire to write was further chilled by observing the reactions to other Jews sharing their thoughts online. A well-known artist I admire posted a heartfelt but politically milquetoast message about grieving, and was attacked as supporting apartheid. Comments on that post included explicit support for Hamas and applause of their violence. 

After speaking to many Jewish-American friends, I heard the same themes time and again. Our views are nuanced as supporters of the state of Israel, but opponents of its current government. Those I spoke with unanimously loathe Netanyahu and his proto-fascist government. We fear tremendous violence in response to these attacks, and recognize that the status quo cannot be maintained in light of last week’s attack. 

Many of those people expressed a newfound fear of being identifiably Jewish at a time when Jews are being targeted, both by violent extremists, and by the reactionary left. 

There are no good or easy ways to resolve the situation in Gaza. That situation arises from complicated history, and finding an unbiased source can be a challenge. It occurs to me that the reasons for how we got here are of much less immediate concern than the question of what comes next. 

Hamas cannot be allowed to continue operating in Gaza. It serves as the de facto government, and its policy is to resist Israel with violence aimed at undermining the existence of Israel. Gaza may live in squalor, but Hamas finds the resources to build weapons factories, rockets, explosives, and other implements of destruction. 

Hamas does not want Palestinians to move out of refugee camps- where some have lived for generations- unless they are moving back into Israel, rectifying the “Nakba,” or catastrophe, of Israeli statehood. Even if Egypt welcomed the Palestinians to resettle in Sinai with open arms, Hamas would resist it, because that would not serve their goal of eradicating Israel. 

Eradicating Hamas is no easy task. As the media and commentators routinely point out, they use civilians as shields, locating their weapons and command facilities in hospitals, mosques, and residential buildings. That way, if their missile launches are met with return fire, they can point to the civilian deaths as additional fuel for their rage against Israel. It is unsurprising that, in response to Israel’s warning that civilians should leave part of Gaza, Hamas ordered them to stay. Without their civilian shield, Hamas stands no chance against the Israeli Defense Forces. They conducted a sneak attack on civilians, hid among civilians in Gaza, and believe this gives them immunity from retribution, because striking a civilian area would be a war crime.

Hamas’ strategy appears to be leveraging world opinion to make Israel functionally helpless to defend itself. Within hours after the attacks came the first calls for a ceasefire. This was likely received in Israel with the same disbelief as if Japan called for a ceasefire the day after Pearl Harbor: we hit you hard, let’s stop fighting before you can hit us back. 

So far, Israel’s allies appear to be giving the Jewish state time to respond as they see fit, without calls for restraint. As the body count in Gaza increases over the next week, I expect the chorus of calls for an Israeli withdrawal to become louder and more widespread. Israel is thus on the clock, and needs to take action to dismantle Hamas with alacrity. Doing a virtually impossible task quickly will come at the cost of doing it efficiently or well. More non-combatants will die because of the time pressure Hamas and its allies are creating, forcing Israel to act rashly or risk not being able to respond at all. 

Last week, the leader of Hamas called for a worldwide “day of rage” against Israel, to take place on Friday, October 13th. Just one week before, Hamas launched a surprise assault on Israel, attacking, raping, kidnapping, and murdering as many Jews as they could find. The “day of rage” was in service of Hamas’ stated, overarching goal: elimination of Israel, and an Arab-Muslim state that extends from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea (this is the origin of the chant “from the river to the sea”). 

Several organizations in New York answered Hamas’ call, and a major protest against Israel was scheduled for Friday the 13th in Times Square. 

Fearing violence, many Midtown businesses- including my law firm- shut their doors early. I let curiosity get the better of me, and went to Times Square to see what was happening. I would like to share three of my observations: 

First, when I spoke with several protesters, none said they support Hamas’ attacks. They universally claimed that they were protesting on behalf of Palestinians, not Hamas. Of course, the tragedy of the Gaza Strip is not new- it has been festering since at least 1967- and the call for rage against Israel came from Hamas, not the Palestinian Authority. I find the claim that this day of rage just happened to fall during the week when Israel buried over 1,300 terror victims is more than a little disingenuous. Still, it was encouraging to see that those protesters were self-aware enough not to explicitly celebrate Hamas’ bloodlust. 

Second, among the many chants I heard was “This is what you get!” with verbal emphasis on the first, third, and fifth words in rhythmic intonation. I wondered what the above-referenced protesters would say to make this sound like anything other than gleeful support of rape and murder. 

Third, I saw a small group of Hasidic Jews. They were not a part of the protest or the counter-protest: they were just in Times Square. More specifically, they were doing something many New Yorkers will recognize, handing out business cards that inform the recipient that their late Rabbi was actually the Messiah, and we should do good deeds to help him bring about paradise, find out more by scanning the QR code. They’ve been doing this for years. These guys aren’t Israelis (probably), weren’t yelling anything for or against Israel or the Palestinians, and were likely born and raised in the city, but they did commit the cardinal sin of being obviously, visibly Jewish. 

I watched multiple protesters screaming at them from just a few paces away, things like “Stop stealing land! Stop stealing land!” 

I wondered where the well-meaning protesters were to explain to me again that their rage is targeted at Zionism, not Jewish people. 

Nobody knows how to talk about this war. Language models strain to their breaking point. Historical comparisons are clumsy at best, and more often veer into hyperbole, appropriation, and Godwin’s Law. It has been nine days since the attack, and today’s memetic example is the comparisons between pro-Palestinian advocacy and “all lives matter.” If you squint, you can see the resonance, but I find this more appropriative than appropriate. 

What is missing from the discourse is any reasonable plan of action. If Israel invades Gaza, what is expected to follow? Surely, more death. Hopefully, major degradation of Hamas and its ability to wage war. Bad infrastructure will become worse infrastructure, and then the rebuilding will start, but with whose money? And to build what? And where will two million Palestinians live in the meantime?

If Israel accepts a ceasefire and stops its siege of Gaza, what then? Hamas will regroup, and surely they will attack again. The population of Gaza has proven unwilling or unable to restrain them. Israel’s government would surely fall, if it takes any action short of eradicating Hamas, and it will be replaced by one that vows to be ruthless. What then of the hostages? Hamas keeps people for years, they don’t even voluntarily return the remains of dead hostages. Will Israel be expected to let captured terrorists go free in exchange for hostages? 

Is that what fidelity to human rights requires? 

Slogans only get you so far. Eventually, one must articulate something concrete to support or oppose, understanding that the former is always harder than the latter. I am against violence. I am against theocracy. I am against war. I am against murder and rape. I am against the existence of an “open air prison” of concentrated human misery. I am against everything that is currently happening. 

But what am I for? 

I am for a strong, safe, and secure Israel. 

I am for self-determination and independence for the Palestinians. 

I am for human dignity. 

So we end where we started: what can I possibly say? Fifteen hundred words in, and I feel I haven’t really said anything. 

I feel sadness, mixed with fear, mixed with rage. I resist countless urges to post something, to comment something, to say something, to take a stand. I resent being forced to take so many stands on so many fraught issues. 

When I do speak, what do people hear? They hear a Jew talking. My views are assumed biased, and perhaps they are; that assumption is certainly a racist one regardless. I am more than my Judaism, more than my family history. So were the people at that music festival. So are the families living in Gaza. 

I feel deep disappointment with so many people around me who are quick to post snarky takes, seemingly eager to find some little way to use this crisis to signal to their fellow leftists that they are on the side of the metaphorical angels, before the literal bodies of the civilians they allegedly care about have cooled. 

I begin to question whether I have done this in the past, with other crises that don’t affect me as deeply as this one. 

That thought leads to another: why do I feel so affected by this? I am not Israeli, and have only been there once, as a child. I loathe their current government, and have for more than a decade. Why, then, does this feel like it was an attack on me? 

I may be more than my identity, but I also cannot escape it. I was born in America because my great grandparents fled violence in Europe, violence specifically aimed at Jews. Back then, Jews had nowhere to go: my forebears were lucky to get into the United States before it effectively closed its borders before and during the Holocaust. During World War II, there was no safe haven for the Jews. 

Identity means more than what you consider yourself to be: too often, it is how society views you. As a Jew, I am viewed as being a part of this cycle of violence, whether I want to be or not. The Hasidic Jews in Times Square could not escape it, and neither can I. My special affinity for Israel as a haven for Jews is not incompatible with respecting Palestinian rights. Neither of those beliefs is inconsistent with condemning senseless violence. 

When the United States misbehaves on the world stage, I feel empowered to speak out against it, and trust that people will not conflate me, an American, with everything America does. I do not feel the safety of that separation with Israel. Though I am not an Israeli, I feel that others hold me accountable for the actions of Israel, because I am Jewish. I do not vote in their elections, and I do not support their leaders, but it doesn’t matter: as a Jew, I will always be held in some quarters to be answerable for Israeli violence. 

Reach out to your Jewish friends, see if they are okay. Offer an ear, and try to really listen. One person among my social-media-alleged thousand friends reached out to me last week, and it helped. I didn’t know what to say to him, either, but it felt good to be heard. 

Thank you for reading. 

-AG

Published in: on October 16, 2023 at 1:51 pm  Leave a Comment  

An Afternoon in White Plains

I’ve had the chance to do a fair bit of traveling recently, and this week, circumstance has brought me to White Plains, which is only about an hour’s drive from where I live. I came for a work conference, but that formally starts tomorrow, so I had a free evening in which to get settled into my hotel and check out the environs of what was billed as the “downtown” of the city.

My only previous experience of White Plains is from over a decade ago, when I interviewed for a job at a debt collection company, a job that I blessedly wasn’t offered at the time. I remember thinking the city was very suburban and, frankly, boring-looking.

In the first ninety minutes after arriving for this conference, I had reason to question all of my preconceived beliefs about the character of White Plains, and to have them all resoundingly confirmed.

I don’t often drive when I travel, so I like to explore the area around my hotel, especially if it is in the middle of an urban area. I scouted ahead on a maps app and knew that there was a mall on the next block, but that everything else was pretty far on foot. I figured a walk through a mall is a nice way to people watch and at least be entertained for a late afternoon; I was also getting kinda hungry.

The mall was indeed on the next block, but it presented as an impenetrable fortress; I walked three-and-a-half sides of it before realizing that the only way in is through the parking garage, a fact made rather irritating by the absence of pedestrian walkways. These were not small blocks, mind you, but a single block, with no streets interrupting it, stretching about two or three avenues worth of distance. I had made my steps for the day before I even breached to the interior of this mall-fortress.

I wondered if it was even there anymore, or if Covid had killed it.

I finally walked into the parking garage, and used their elevator to reach one of three “Retail” floors, denoted with that word and nothing more in the elevator. A single sign on one wall said “Want to Explore?” and had a QR code.

Before that even loaded, I disembarked into a retro mall wonderland. It was all the modern stores one would expect in a mediocre mall: Ann Taylor, Nordstrom, Michael Kors, and several jewelry stores, but it was in this completely enclosed space, vast but buried deep in a concrete exostructure of parking lot.

Also, there weren’t more then perhaps a dozen customers in the entire mall- the ENTIRE mall- on a late Thursday afternoon. Every one of the thirty-odd stores was open, evidently staffed, and completely devoid of custom.

I decided to slake my hunger first, and headed for the food court. Multiple signs pointed its direction and hyped it up in a weirdly non-specific way- and listing none of the food offerings. At the end of the arrows was an elevator, and instructions to take it to the fourth floor, where the generically titled food court (Crave, I think?) was located.

On the way, I looked up finer dining options, and saw that there were two in the area: PF Chang’s or the Cheesecake Factory. I felt like I was back at the Arden Mall in Sacramento, minus the good stores and nearby fairgrounds.

The elevator deposited me at Crave and I saw its offerings: three “coming soon” installations that had evidently been there for a long time, and three types of burger joints. They were all open, and I decided to go with Shake Shack- I don’t buy the hype about their food, but this was a devil-you-know situation. Plus, they had dreamsicle custard shakes.

The food court seating area was massive, plainly designed to host six restaurants’ worth of diners during a holiday rush. But today there were so few people shopping that I got an entire eating section to myself. I liked the food- a white truffle burger that was quite tasty, and fries that were hot and salted just right.

I was bound and determined to stop into some store, for some reason, since I had gone to so much damn trouble to get into this mall, but none of the stores appealed to me in the least. I tried to brainstorm things I could use that these stores even carried, but was uninspired. I briefly looked for talcum powder at L’Occitane, for when I inevitably cut myself shaving. L’Occitane does not carry talcum powder.

I decided to leave and come back to my hotel, if just to vent the profound, suburban misery that is an afternoon in White Plains. Even that proved a challenge- following the exit signs, I found myself in a concrete labyrinth, plainly designed for workers at the stores as a back way in, but it was open and there were exit signs pointing at it. It led down multiple twists and turns, only to end at an alarmed emergency exit. I backtracked.

After finally making my way out of the labyrinth the same way I had entered- through the underground parking garage, walking in a driving lane- I returned to the hotel, saw myself in, and sat down to write about it.

I had low expectations for an afternoon in White Plains, and it still managed to trip over the bar.

~AG

Published in: on April 12, 2023 at 3:46 pm  Leave a Comment  

The Block Party

Revisiting a cringe fandom from my youth.

When I was in third grade, one of my classmates- a fun and mischievous boy named Gennaro- invited me to his birthday party. I forget if he was turning seven or eight, but we were both around that age. Along with the cake and candies and decorations, Gennaro’s parents arranged for each kid attending to be given a collectible sticker book, featuring a band, all the rage at the time: the New Kids on the Block. 

It was the first time I became aware of the concept of “new music.” That is, music that my parents had not heard of, that was written and performed for the youth. I became a super fan, seeking out their music and learning about the members of the band. This was pre-internet, at least for me, so this research involved an awful lot of MTV, radio, and teen magazines. I learned their songs and practiced singing along; I wanted to be in that group! 

The following summer, my family visited my Grandpa Dan, and he gave me my very first walkman. He also gave me two cassettes, one that he knew I would like, and one that he wanted me to learn to like. That is how it came to pass that my first two albums of music were Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, and Step By Step by the New Kids on the Block. 

It took several years and an untold amount of teasing and bullying before I realized that their music was targeted at girls, not boys. It took one or two additional years before I realized their music was also objectively terrible. 

As with so many of the cringe parts of childhood, I experienced great shame at having ever been a fan of such a terrible boy band, and did my best to forget the whole thing ever happened. 

Fortunately, I have siblings, and if I was bound to forget all about the New Kids, they were always there to remind me. And that is how it came to pass that my sister invited me to D.C. last month for a “Block Party,” a musical revue featuring Salt-N-Pepa, En Vogue, Rick Astley, and the New Kids on the Block. 

The show was at the Capital One Arena, a hockey and basketball venue. Kelsey was persuaded to join me and Elizabeth for this event. That would be impressive enough, as Kelsey did not grow up with NKOTB, but this particular show was on the night before Kelsey’s birthday, so their willingness to go was more than a kindness, it was an outright act of love. 

Like some modern arenas, Capital One’s has restrooms that can be gender-adjusted based on the anticipated crowd. For hockey, there could be twice as many men’s rooms as women’s rooms, for instance. I do not know the ratio they employed for this concert, but I had to walk for ten minutes, past several twin sets of ladies’ rooms, to find one for men. Once we found our seats, the reason became apparent: men constituted but a small minority of the attendance. I counted four men in our section, among approximately a hundred and fifty women. 

The beginning of the show featured a video presentation, which was somewhat unsatisfactory as our view of the big screen was mostly blocked by a speaker. In the intro, they showed pictures of the artists in their prime, and then pictures of them now, in heavy makeup. I joked that they were presenting it as “here is what they looked like, and here’s the best we could make them look today!” 

All of the artists had aged, no doubt. These former boy-band idols were now well into their fifties, and their ability to move around the stage had certainly taken a hit. However, they could still sing, and they sang quite well. Of course, the songs were still just as bad as they had ever been, but these guys weren’t selling music, they were selling nostalgia, and this crowd was buying. 

I saw a cadre of very young women in our section, perhaps late teens/early twenties, dancing and singing along to every word of these thirty-year-old songs, and experienced the confusing emotions of recognizing one’s youth in today’s retro culture.

Salt-n-Pepa were in black leather, holding whips; it gave a BDSM vibe that was definitely working, especially as they were accompanied at all times by young, muscly men who did their bidding.  

The production was heavy-handed, with lights, smoke, special effects, and liberal use of the AV screen. My sister and I sang along to the few songs we remembered well, and puzzled over those that were entirely unfamiliar. Kelsey was a trooper, and seemed to at least enjoy laughing at me for my former fandom. 

We left well before the end- the concert wasn’t long, but we had a full day of museums and walking around before the show, and we were tired. As we left, Joey McIntire started singing “Please Don’t Go, Girl,” which seemed like a great song to end the night.

The mishmash of nostalgia was actually fairly enjoyable, and for me, it wasn’t being supplied as much by the bands as by our fellow attendees. People my age and older were rocking late-80s/early 90s styles, singing at the top of their lungs, and engaging in the self-deprecation of reliving a silly part of our shared youth. The music was bad, but it was OUR bad music, and we reveled in it. 

The Block Party was a singular experience, and a fun one. I learned that it can be fun to embrace one’s cringiness, especially after so many years. 

-AG 

Published in: on August 7, 2022 at 3:18 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,

N.K. Jemisin and Le Guin de L’Escalier

How an embarrasing interaction led me to some worthwhile literature.

After a year of isolation, I found the prospect of re-entering the social scene both exciting and terrifying. Extroversion has served me well all my life, but social skills are like a muscle, apt to atrophy if left unused. 2020 was the great atrophy.

When I was invited to a party in June- aptly named “June Party”- I arrived with a combination of anxiety and exhilaration. I knew only a handful of the twenty-odd guests, and struggled to remember how to make new friends.

So, it came as a great relief when an attractive stranger approached me, thrust a hand forward, and made an introduction. We had a few mutuals, and quickly found a conversational rapport. She told me that she loved to read, particularly fiction, and I experienced that thrill of discovering a common interest, one on which I can converse for hours.

She asked if I read any science fiction or fantasy; I replied that I love science fiction, it is among my favorite genres. She then asked me a question that utterly defeated me: who are some of your favorite women sci-fi authors?

With the benefit of l’espirit de l’escalier, I had several viable responses open to me: I am a fan of Ursula Le Guin, and have read a bunch of Marion Zimmer Bradley. I could have started a conversation about whether Mary Shelley should be considered science fiction or horror, ditto Anne Rice, one of my favorite authors. I had options.

Instead, I stood there stammering like an idiot for about ten seconds, unable to recall a single name, and with the rising awareness of just how dumb I was appearing to this new acquaintance.

She took mercy on me, and answered her own question, rattling off several names I had not heard of, but would later learn are more on the fantasy side of the genre divide. I recovered from this momentary mortification, and made a mental note to read at least one of the authors she mentioned.

The next day, I ordered several books by N.K. Jemisin, one of those authors. Now, I typically steer clear of authors who sign off by two initials, as they have a tendency to be pseudonyms, or transphobes. Jemisin, I was assured, was neither of these things; a woman of color enjoying great success in the male-dominated world of fantasy writing.

After waiting the obligatory two days for delivery, I received and immediately started on her book The City We Became, which was described as a tribute to New York City.

My reading has focused much more heavily on science fiction than fantasy, so I found the opening parts of the novel quite jarring. The premise into which the reader is thrust, in media res, is that the city is “being born,” a process that happens to any city of a certain size and character. It accomplishes this task by taking on an avatar, a human who embodies the city and is empowered by it. That avatar must then face off against an enemy of unclear motivations, who seeks to destroy the city for reasons that are not entirely made apparent.

About fifty pages into the book, I realized with disappointment that I was not enjoying it. The plot seemed farcical rather than fantastic, and I had the creeping sense that I was missing some key context. I checked the cover to see if perhaps this was a sequel, and discovered that it was in fact the first book in a series.

One bias sci-fi readers bring to fantasy novels is a need to know why things are as they are. While the borders are often hazy, this is the clearest distinction in my experience: while both contain the weird and the wonderful, science fiction authors will go to great pains to explain why those things exist, while fantasy authors ask the reader to accept the fantastic elements and move on.

I struggled with this, particularly with Jemisin’s avatar-as-city device. There were suggestions throughout the novel that some greater force was at work, and that there was some underlying conflict, possibly on the lines of order versus chaos, fueling the awakening of cities. The book talked around this without addressing it squarely; I hope and expect it will be further developed in the as-yet-unwritten sequels.

For the “awakening” of New York, avatars representing the five boroughs had to come together and find the unified city avatar, who was gravely injured in an attack by the enemy of dubious origin. That avatar was in repose at an abandoned subway station in Manhattan.

About midway through, my opinion on the book changed, primarily due to the excellent character development and dialogue. I felt that Jemisin was giving me a peek into communities within the city that are generally inaccessible to those on the outside. The avatars for Queens and the Bronx were particularly well-cast and provided commentary on the culture and pride of those boroughs.

As the story neared its climax, the avatar from Staten Island went rogue, teaming up with the enemy and refusing to join the unified effort to save the city. Like many in New York, I have never met a joke at Staten Island’s expense that I didn’t like, and the image of that borough putting its own selfish needs above those of the collective was pitch perfect.

In the end, the efforts to save New York succeeded, due to a new fifth avatar arising to replace Staten Island: Jersey City, represented by a friend and colleague of the Bronx’s avatar. Together, the avatars rescued the main city champion, and the conflict resolved, though a sinister pall still attained over Staten Island.

Overall, I found The City We Became to be a delightful read, if slow to get underway. It reaffirmed the merits of reading beyond my typical genres at the recommendation of others. I picked up a copy of the Broken Earth trilogy, also by Jemisin, and hope that the longer form leaves me with fewer unanswered questions.

Or, barring that, I hope that it is memorable enough that the next time a cute stranger asks me to name a woman author, I am caught less flat-footed.

-AG

Published in: on July 22, 2021 at 8:46 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , ,

To Be Set Right

On the conflicted values of a Millenial Zionist.

I grew up in a Jewish family in Lexington, Kentucky.  As we were a small religious minority in the area, my parents took great pains to make sure I had a Jewish education.  This included Sunday School, Hebrew School, and a series of summer camps.  Throughout all of it, in addition to the history, religion, and cultural lessons, ran a strong thread of Zionism. 

Looking at Jewish history, it is easy to see why this was the case.  The Jewish story is one of repeated exile, pogrom, and holocaust.  Our history is rife with sad remembrances, and celebrations that boil down to “they tried to kill us, they failed, hallelujah.”  Israel, which came into existence around the time my parents did, was and remains the only Jewish-majority modern state.  Its brief history hit on familiar themes: they tried to kill us, again and again, but we persisted. 

I choose my pronouns carefully: I was raised thinking of Israel as my country, too, though I have only been there once, as a young tourist.  I have understood, as have many Jewish Americans, that if circumstances warrant, I can always move to Israel; living there is my birthright.

My intellectually formative years took place between the first and second intifada.  I mourned along with my family when Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated.  I remember the adults wondering aloud whether this meant the end of the peace process.  I also remember them saying, in hushed tones, how glad they were that the assassin was not Palestinian.  

By the time I started college, I had developed a fascination with the history and politics of the Middle East, and wrote pro-Israel columns in the campus newspaper.  I decried the hypocrisy of Israel’s neighbor states, who kept Palestinian refugees in squalor as political pawns, never permitting them to develop or integrate, all while claiming to be their champions in the world community.  I advocated for returning Gaza to Egypt, and returning the West Bank to Jordan (or, a fortiori, Transjordan).  

The core of my support for Israel in their conflict with the Palestinians was a deeply-ingrained belief, fomented and nurtured over many years of Zionist education, that the Palestinians and their supporters did not appropriately value human life.  I was outraged when Hamas placed its bases and military assets next to hospitals and orphanages, or when suicide bombers sought to maximize loss of life.  I viewed those incidents as proof that in this asymmetrical conflict, Israel had the better weapons, but the Palestinians had the freedom to kill indiscriminately.  

My views began to change after Ariel Sharon’s visit to the Temple Mount set off another wave of violence.  His administration, and later, that of Benjamin Netanyahu, undermined my belief in Israel’s virtue.  The aggressive settlement expansion, the serial objections to direct negotiation, and the policies that treated non-Jews as second class citizens disgusted me.  These were not our values; these did not represent who we want to be as a Jewish nation. 

It is possible to love your country and hate your government, as any liberal who lived through the Trump years can attest.  But it became harder and harder, under the Netanyahu government, to identify as a Zionist without implicitly ratifying the disgusting policies of the Likud party. Zionist became a political position more than a statement of national pride.  Do you support Palestinian independence, or are you a Zionist? 

I opt for both.  I am a Zionist, proud of the establishment of a Jewish state and committed to preserving and protecting this one small country that will always welcome members of its diaspora.  It may be hard to fathom, but the relative safety and acceptance of Jewish people in the United States is a historical anomaly.  Through most of history, Jewish people have been at best tolerated, and at worse, faced with systematic extermination. 

I am also an American, and one of our foundational tenets is a belief in the right to self-determination.  Israel has made plain that it will not welcome the Palestinians into their country as citizens, jeopardizing the Jewish majority.  That means the people of Palestine need to be given real self-government, sufficient land to form a viable state, and the economic assistance required of any new state to develop and join the world community.  

It has been hard to find truly neutral accounts of what is happening in Israel these days.  Most of my reading- my algorithms skew liberal- has been decidedly anti-Israel, portraying them as attacking Gaza for no reason, and killing indiscriminately.  The pro-Israel writing dates the start of the present violence to rocket attacks from Gaza, ignoring the eviction of Palestinians from East Jerusalem to make way for Jewish settlers.  

Israel conducts its egregious actions under color of law, “legally” evicting Palestinians and slowly, steadily transitioning key parts of East Jerusalem to Jewish occupation, foreclosing it as a future capital for a Palestinian state.  The Palestinians do not have the ability to act under color of law, so they resort to violence.  Lacking the technical prowess of the IDF, that violence is often indiscriminate.  Rocket launchers are placed atop schools, hospitals, and media buildings to deter counterstrikes; if they were kept away from civilian centers, as Israel demands, they would be quickly and cataclysmically destroyed by Israel’s superior military might. 

There are no “good guys” in this conflict.  For all its social services, Hamas is a terrorist organization, and its indiscriminate attacks coupled with its refusal to even acknowledge Israel’s right to exist disqualifies it as a player in the peace talks.  Israel has the power to improve the lives of the Palestinians living under its control, but refuses, and takes every opportunity to avenge rocket attacks with devastating reprisal strikes, often disproportionate to the provocation.  

Jewish Americans like me, who grew up idolizing Israel, must now reckon with a government of right-wing extremists seeking to consolidate power and crush the prospects of a two-state solution.  As Jewish identity and Zionism were so closely linked in my religious education, it can be hard to question fidelity to Israel without shaking the foundations of that identity.  

I identify as a Zionist because my belief in the necessity for a Jewish state, and my appreciation for the establishment and existence of that state, is valid.  I identify as pro-Palestinian because I believe that people have a right to self-determination, and to their own pursuits of life, liberty, and happiness.  I criticize Israel because I support Israel, and I believe that the best way I can show support is to advocate for less extreme policies and a greater acceptance of Palestinian rights.  I criticize the Palestinians because I support their goal of statehood, and believe the actions of Hamas and its supporters are contrary to that goal.  

As Senator Carl Schurz once said, “My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right.”  For Jewish Americans like me, that is our challenge and obligation if we choose to identify as Zionists: to set things right, and to speak out against actions that undermine our values.  

It has been just under twenty four hours since the ceasefire took hold.  I pray it lasts.

-AG

Published in: on May 21, 2021 at 10:59 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , ,

The Things that Broke

A lesson in applied catharsis

Over this weekend, Kelsey and I are moving from our home in Jackson Heights to a new loft apartment in Astoria. We had been in our old place for five years, and while the rent and location were nice, there were a growing number of things we disliked about our apartment. The mail theft, for one, and frequent, persistent bug infestations. I have a thing about bugs in my living space, and our inability to fully, finally exterminate them made the apartment increasingly uncomfortable for me.

Then, with the COVID-19 pandemic, rents fell dramatically. Our own landlord wasn’t even requesting a rent increase for renewal, a sure sign that the market was good for renters. We started looking, and within a few days, found our new home. It is in Astoria, where the plurality of my chosen New York family live, right on the park, with high ceilings and a modern feel. I think we will be very happy here.

We also got lucky with our movers, Moishe’s, the same company I used five years before to move into Jackson Heights. They were friendly, careful, and thorough. They made it easy.

Today is our second day of unpacking, and I have spent it opening bins and sorting the contents into their assigned positions. It is a tedious task, made tolerably pleasant by audiobooks and enthusiasm for this next chapter of life.

At the bottom of one of the last bins, I saw that something was wrong: there were shards in the bottom, which could mean only one thing: an item had broken. It happens all the time, when moving, but this was the first I had seen. I investigated, and became distraught.

Several items had been destroyed, all in the same bin. Some combination of poor packing or rough handling doomed this particular bin’s contents to oblivion. Two of the broken items were of great sentimental value.

The first, largest, and most important was a statue replica, standing about eighteen inches high, of Rodin’s piece “The Eternal Idol.” I have written in these pages about this sculpture before: it belonged to my Grandma Jeanne, and was one of the three items I received after her passing. It depicts a man kneeling before a seated woman, kissing her midsection. It is erotic without being vulgar.

Before she passed, my grandma told me it was called “The Kiss,” but that is a different sculpture, though similar in some respects. This one, far less well-known, was made during Rodin’s work on the Gates of Hell, his sculpted opus, though it was not incorporated into the final piece. I adore it, and associate it with the dignified elegance of my late grandmother. It was so heavy I assumed it was made of solid metal, but beneath the chrome finish is ceramic, and it broke right in half, the woman cleaved at the torso.

When I was young, we would visit my grandmother in California, and she would hide that sculpture, having decided it was too racy for young eyes. When she moved to Lexington, she brought it, along with the rest of her impressive art collection. As I have begun to accumulate my own art, I am always silently comparing my taste to hers, and some part of me hopes she would approve of the ways I decorate my living spaces.

The Rodin sat on my bar, and was set for a place of honor in the new loft. Perhaps it can be restored somewhat, but it will surely show the marks of having been broken. I asked Kelsey to take a stab at fixing it. I don’t think it will ever look like it did before, but I feel that the statue’s story has not yet ended.

The second broken piece is a menorah, made of welded metal on a stone base. It was a gift from my former father-in-law, Scott.

When I became engaged to my first wife, her family split in their reactions. Her folks were long-divorced. Her mom was supportive, and we got along famously. Her dad, however, strongly objected on the basis of my Judaism. He hosted Ashley for a visit shortly after our engagement, and tried to talk her out of it, saying that as a Jew, I was certainly bound for hell, and she should choose a spouse who was at least eligible for admission to heaven. It was hurtful, and I never became close with that side of the family.

Her mothers’ spouse, Scott, was a friendly, skilled, good-hearted man, but nobody would mistake him for woke. He hailed from the Carolinas, and had a large confederate battle flag tattooed on his arm. Nonetheless, he made an extraordinary effort to make me feel not just accepted, but welcomed into the family. At our first Christmas after the wedding, he gave me the menorah, a giant and sturdy candelabra that he had welded from spare parts in his workshop. Every detail was perfect, and it meant so much to me that he would find a way to connect with me as a Jewish person, and give me a gift put together with so much love and consideration.

Even after Ashley and I divorced almost eight years later, I kept the menorah. It was the centerpiece of my Hannukah celebration as recently as three months ago. I am not sure precisely how it broke, but it broke spectacularly, and definitely beyond any opportunity of repair.

When I discovered these items, I felt devastated and my productivity came to a complete halt. After talking through my reactions with Kelsey and my sister, I realized that the reason these items were so special to me is because they remind me of entire stories. They are not objects: they are vehicles for memory. If someone were to remark on the statue, I had a whole story to tell them, about my elegant grandmother. For the menorah, it is one of the few items I kept from my first marriage, and reminds me of a great kindness that resonates even now.

I also realized that telling these stories, putting them in tangible form, would lessen the impact of losing the items themselves. The pieces of ceramic and metal and stone have no special value: it is what they represent. They remind me of special people and bygone times.

It is my hope with this post, I can let my writing, and not the things that broke, serve as a vehicle for these memories.

-AG

Published in: on March 21, 2021 at 6:03 pm  Comments (1)  

The Last Night

An unvarnished account of the death of my beloved cat.

I was sitting at my computer desk, tabbing between news articles and social media, when Kelsey came back into the room.  

“I don’t think Fin’s doing very well,” they said.  

I got up to investigate.  Sure enough, there was Fin, standing in the hall near the bedroom, his body tense and contorted as though he were about to hairball, shit on the floor, or both.  He didn’t look up at me, opening his mouth and exhaling hard, as though trying to vomit, but only a small drop or two of liquid came out. 

With a coo of reassurance I bent down to give him a pet.  He smelled bad, a combination of the aforementioned bodily functions.  He had always been a sweet-smelling cat. 

He took a step forward, crouched as though to shit again, and tensed hard.  I thought about moving him to the litter box, but he seemed to have enough problems without an emergency airlift.  I let him be.  After a moment, a single drop of liquid defecation fell out, and he walked further down the hall. 

Fin was 19.  I had been with him since he was five weeks old, and he was a fixture in my life, my loyal companion.   I knew he was getting near the end of his life, just chronologically.  Over the past year, though, I had seen him visibly decline.  He stopped jumping, even to get up on the bed.  His vision had plainly clouded, and he often bumped into walls while navigating across the hall.  

Kelsey and I did our best for him.  We bought a small cat bed to place next to ours, and next to the radiator, so he would have a warm place near us to sleep.  We put additional cat beds in every room of the house, and put bags of treats in places we spent the most time.  I intended to spoil him rotten for whatever time I had left with him. 

I went to clean up the mess, and saw that his tail had dipped into it, spreading it to other parts of the floor, and to his fur.  A bath was in order; I gave it to him.  He stood in the tub, miserable and helpless, as I poured cupfulls of warm water over his fur, cleaning him as best I could.  Kelsey brought a big towel, and I wrapped him up in it, sitting down on the toilet lid and cradling him like an infant. 

He looked so small and helpless, worlds away from the sharp-pawed rascal of his youth.  

He hadn’t eaten, so I tried to give him some of his favorite food- tuna water- through a small syringe we used when he needed medicine.  He resisted it, having no appetite.  I managed to get several squirts of it into him despite his lack of cooperation, but a few minutes later, he retched it back up.  His breathing was labored.  I was worried he might die in my arms. 

Fully nine years earlier, I almost lost him.  He had a major illness, vomiting up bile and refusing food.  I took him to the vet, and they couldn’t find the cause.  When medicine didn’t help, I didn’t know what to do; he wasn’t eating, and there was no obvious cause.  He was weak, and could hardly stand on his own.  

A follow-up visit to the vet determined that he had an intestinal blockage, which was removed by minor surgery; it was a whole almond.  After weeks of nursing him back to health, he recovered.  I felt like I had been given a gift, more time with him.  

I checked the clock; it was nearing one in the morning, technically it was now New Year’s Eve.  I had no work during the day, so stayed up with Fin for several more hours.  He didn’t improve, nor did he decline.  His breathing was unlabored, but he wouldn’t eat, and would barely open his eyes.  I just kept petting him gently and keeping him warm, and company.  

Finally, at 4am, I decided to go to sleep.  I placed Fin in his bed, next to the radiator, still wrapped in his towel.  He purred a little bit; he always did like laying in a warm bed.  I crawled into my own and fell asleep.  I could hear him gently snoring as I drifted off. 

I slept reasonably well, a side effect of going to bed exhausted, but not for very long.  At 7am, I woke up, absolutely certain that Fin had died.  I can’t tell you how, but I knew.  I was sleeping on the far side of a king-sized bed from his, and Kelsey was fast asleep between us, so I slowly got out of bed, circled around, and went to his side. 

There could be no mistaking it.  He was still, cold, and utterly lifeless.  He was still wrapped in the towel.  I scrunched up my face with emotion as hard as I could, but silently, not wanting to wake up Kelsey just yet.  I picked up Fin’s body and took him into the bathroom, washing off the few parts of his fur that had been soiled since his bath the night before.  Then, I took him into the library and sat with him.  

I was whispering to him the whole time, though I can’t remember what I said.  I probably thanked him for being such a good cat to me, and for all the wonderful times we had together. 

I laid him out on the coffee table and wrapped him up completely in the towel.  Then, I went to the bedroom, woke up Kelsey, and told her that Fin was gone. 

Over the next hour, I made a half-dozen phone calls to the closest people in my life, activating my support network.  Kelsey took care of the arrangements for Fin, whose corporeal form left us a few hours later, in the care of a sympathetic vet.  New Years Eve was a hard day, full of many tears and fond memories of Fin.   

It seemed fitting that Fin would choose that day to leave us.  His name, after all, means “end” in French.  He left along with 2020, a challenging year, but his memory will be with me for the rest of my life. 

-AG

Published in: on January 28, 2021 at 2:33 pm  Leave a Comment  

Infamy

January 6, 2021 confirmed my worst fears, and showed us all the true nature of Trumpism.

In October 2016, I had a specific, troubling fear. We were weeks away from the presidential election, and all indications were that Hillary Clinton would become our next president. Her opponent, Donald Trump, seemed like a comic book villain, all bluster and macho chauvinism. Breathless coverage followed his every tweet, his every campaign event. It was a train wreck in slow motion; what would he say next?

The news de jour was feverish speculation among the chattering class, centered on whether Trump would gracefully accept his anticipated defeat. Actually, that wasn’t quite it: nobody thought he would be graceful. Rather, the speculation was whether he would accept the election’s result, full stop. Would he admit reality, or would he continue to insist that the election had been rigged, and that he was, in fact, the victor?

After all, he had demonstrated a loose and flexible relationship with the truth, and had no compunctions about telling outright lies, time and again, repeating them until his followers accepted them as mantra. At the risk of provoking Godwin’s law, there is an old saw about the power of big lies.

My fear, at that time, was not whether or not Trump would accept the results of 2016. It was whether, in the then-unlikely event he were to win, he would accept the results of an election that took place during his presidency.

In the months since election day 2020, we have seen the answer. Not only has the president refused to accept the outcome, he has fired his supporters up into a fantastical frenzy, bellowing conspiracy theories, demonizing all who refuse to bow to his fictional accounts. Much of this he accomplished on his own, but he had enablers, from the withered husk of a former NYC mayor to a bloviating, bearded Ted Cruz. There were many more, and media- both social and conventional- are now repeating their names, lest we forget their role in this sad episode.

Yesterday, at the president’s urging, armed insurgents breached the US Capitol, sending legislators, staff, and law enforcement scrambling to remain safe. The United States flag was thrown to the ground, a flag adorned with TRUMP taking its place. This is what fascism looks like: employing violence to gain what cannot be achieved by legal means.

In his remarks on the floor of a joint session of Congress, Senator Ted Cruz could not cite any evidence to support his “belief” that the election was conducted fraudulently. Instead, he urged colleagues to join him because of the substantial minority of Americans who believe that it was. Why, one might wonder, would so many people believe something that isn’t so, especially after unsuccessful efforts to demonstrate it in countless courts and legislatures?

The answer, of course, is because the doubts about the conduct and accuracy of the 2020 election were the Big Lie, the one repeated ad nauseum by Donald Trump and his mealy-mouthed myrmidons. People like Ted Cruz created a widespread belief in lies, and then cited that belief as reason enough to oppose and delay the transition of power.

After witnessing the Proud Boys staging an armed invasion of the US Capitol, there can be no remaining doubt about what Donald Trump meant when he told them to “stand back and stand by” at a presidential debate.

Mike Pence, for years chief among Donald Trump’s minions, was asked to subvert the constitution and assert the power to unilaterally choose the next president. Had that power existed, which it does not, it would have allowed the last vice-president to throw out the results of Trump’s own election in 2016: that role was then held by Joe Biden, our president-elect.

Donald Trump serves no master but his own narcissistic quest for power, fame, and wealth. He has shown that he will never give them up, no matter what. They must be taken from him.

I doubt that the 25th Amendment will be employed, though I hope that it will. I doubt that the congress will impeach and remove Donald Trump in the waning days of his administration. I have no doubt that he will pardon himself, and his supporters who engaged in criminal and terroristic conduct yesterday. We have a word for what this is:

Donald Trump is a traitor. The insurgents who stormed the US Capitol are traitors. The senators and representatives who enabled and encouraged his pathetic attempt to overturn the election are traitors.

And no patriotic American can continue to support any of them, full stop. This is no longer a matter of differing political views, or even worldviews. It is now Americans against the fascists, and too many fascists are among us.

Yesterday was a dark day in American history, and we must never forget those who caused it. Remember their names, and hold them accountable.

-AG

Published in: on January 7, 2021 at 5:09 pm  Leave a Comment  

Week Ten

A dispatch from the front lines of NYC in a public health crisis.

It’s Friday, fucking finally.  I’m not sure there was anything objectively worse about the past seven days than the seven days before that, but it felt exceptionally long and hard.  

It’s a holiday weekend, too, a weekend that in any other year would feature a brief trip, an AirBnB with friends or, at the very least, a barbecue or a beach trip.  Memorial Day is every summer’s early triumph, and we don’t get one this year.  It’s a bitter pill. 

It’s also an extraordinarily long period of time to be home, choosing between pleasant but anxious mass video chats with other people, or the continued solitude of various screens of entertainment. Eating one of the few variety of meals you can make with the things on hand, without having to venture out in this mess.  

I’m taking it seriously, the virus.  My ZIP code is on every list of worst hit places in the world, per capita, and this thing is nasty.  I don’t want it.  So I’m following the regulations, and then some.  Double-thick, homemade cloth mask with two straps, a fitted nosepiece, and even a coffee filter stuck in between the fabric layers.  Six feet, on all sides, at all times.  Don’t touch things with your hands, don’t touch your face at all, try not to touch, well, anything.  

Try to make eye contact, and nod to folks.  To be kind to neighbors, while keeping them distant.  

I had been out of my apartment building a total of five times in ten weeks.

So, this Friday, I had an unexpectedly heavy and productive day of remote work, and when it hit late afternoon, I needed to mail a letter; it was a work thing.  I had the envelope, I had the stamps, all I needed was to drop it in the blue box for sending.  I thought, in the words of a dear friend, “fuck it, it’s Friday” and left the house a bit before closing time, hoping to catch a lull in whatever muted foot traffic was taking place on Junction Boulevard. 

It was the last thing I had to do before the holiday weekend, whatever that will look like this year. 

I geared up, stepped out the front door, and immediately smelled weed.  It was that pleasant olfactory memory thing, where I immediately associated it with every other summer day I’ve smelled that, walking past the same group of guys who hang out in front of our neighbor’s building, talking and smoking weed.  

They were out there now. One had no mask on at all, and one had a mask that was strapped behind his head but pulled down below his chin, technically rendering it an item of jewelry.  The other had a paper mask that was on correctly.  I gave them a wide berth but we exchanged nods of recognition as I stepped into the street to pass them.  

Junction Boulevard is a vibrant artery of Queens.  It is a hub for families from Corona and Jackson Heights, and serves as their border.  My favorite deli is there, my drug store, grocery, bodega, and train stop.  

It’s ordinarily very crowded.  

And as I expected, it wasn’t crowded, not in any traditional sense of the word.  I didn’t make physical contact with any people, which on ordinary days is well-nigh impossible.  Six feet, though, was out of the question.  It would be literally impossible to navigate my neighborhood in such a manner.  There are simply too many of us.  

Those three neighbor stoners proved to be an apt microcosm.  About a third of the people were wearing no masks at all.  There was nobody giving them trouble, no police presence to speak of, and I observed at least fifty people without masks, in close proximity to passersby, in the ten minutes I was outside.  Another third of people had masks of various quality and material, and were wearing them on their faces. 

I wish that I could have left off the end of that last sentence.  

A full third of the people I observed were in obvious, physical possession of a mask, but were not wearing it, or not wearing it correctly, or wearing it as the aforementioned jewelry.  They weren’t using it, but they had it on-hand.  

I get why they are doing that.  They need the mask in case they want to go into a store, or if the local precinct happens by. But they otherwise don’t, can’t, and/or won’t wear their mask the way we are supposed to.  I’m tempted to scold people, but remember my own privilege, and that I don’t really know people’s reasons or motives.  I should just steer clear, and do what I can to protect my own health. 

Honestly, it was scary.  I was so aware that somewhere out there, in public, is this damned virus that has turned the world upside-down.  It’s real, it’s deadly, and I see its reflection in every stranger I pass on the street, silently calculating my odds and measuring my distance and even my breathing as I pass them.  We are all each other’s potential enemies. 

I got the letter mailed, and navigated home at a slower, more deliberate pace.  I thought about whether we are coming through to the end of the pandemic, or if a resurgence will be the next thing. I fear it will be the latter. Not enough people are still taking this seriously.  The last time I was out, about a month ago, there were far fewer people out, and nearly everyone had masks.  There were lines back then for the grocery store and Rite Aid. 

Today, there was a line for the healthcare clinic.  The line spanned two full blocks.  

-AG

Published in: on May 22, 2020 at 4:13 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , ,